Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 77:29

ומה במקום שמחשבה פוסלת במוקדשין בארבע עבודות אין הכל הולך אלא אחר העובד

I grant however, that as far as Resh Lakish is concerned, the assertion with regard to services performed inside presents no real difficulty, for one view<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., his own view.');">¹⁰</span> he expressed before he learnt [the interpretation of the Mishnah] from [his master]. R'Johanan, and the other after he learnt it from R'Johanan. But [the assertion with regard to] services performed outside clearly contradicts R'Johanan! - After raising this objection he [R'Shesheth] answered it thus: [The Mishnah] refers to the four principal services,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of every sacrifice, viz., slaughtering, receiving the blood, carrying it forward to the altar, and sprinkling it. If in the course of one of these services the priest intended to eat the sacrificial meat at the improper time the sacrifice is piggul (Rashi) . According to R. Gershom, Rashba and others, the meaning is: If in the course of the slaughtering he intended to perform one of the following services at the improper time, namely, to ;xuh atr receive the blood, or to carry it forward, or to sprinkle it, or to burn the fat, the sacrifice is piggul. V. ad loc.');">¹¹</span> and the passage must be read as follows: If in the case of consecrated animals, where a wrongful intention<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. of eating the flesh of the sacrifice beyond the time prescribed.');">¹²</span> expressed in the course of any one of the four principal services renders them invalid, it is established that everything depends solely upon the intention of him who performs the service,

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 77:29. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.